Sun July 21, 2013
Fighting Fire With Fire: Why Some Burns Are Good For Nature
Originally published on Sun July 21, 2013 1:50 pm
Wildfires were once essential to the American West. Prairies and forests burned regularly, and those fires not only determined the mix of flora and fauna that made up the ecosystem, but they regenerated the land.
When people replaced wilderness with homes and ranches, they aggressively eliminated fire. But now, scientists are trying to bring fire back to the wilderness, to recreate what nature once did on its own.
One place they're doing this is Centennial Valley, in southwestern Montana.
Rimmed by snow-capped mountains, Centennial Valley is about as wild as it gets in the lower 48. In part, that's because the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and now The Nature Conservancy, own big patches of it and keep it wild. But what's been missing there is fire.
For millennia, fire kept this place a sea of thick, knee-high sagebrush and short grass, patched with clusters of aspen trees. A century ago, the government decided to stop all wildfires. That move upset the balance of the ecosystem.
The Conservancy's Nathan Korb walks me up a gentle slope, across a meadow and into a thicket of aspen and evergreens. Red tail hawks swoop above, and every now and then, you can hear the prehistoric sound of a sandhill crane calling. I can hear chain saws somewhere in the woods.
Korb is an ecologist who lives here much of the year. "So we are on private lands, adjacent to wilderness," he says, "and we're trying to make the private land safe for fire so that fire managers can allow fires to burn naturally when they get started in the wilderness."
The Conservancy and state ecologists sometimes start "controlled" burns to burn off high grass and undergrowth — excess "fuel" that could turn the naturally occurring fires into out-of-control infernos. Or, sometimes they let natural fires burn instead of putting them out right away — that's a choice that accomplishes the same thing.
But those fires need to be managed, so a fire crew is removing fir trees. Firs burn too vigorously and can spread fire where fire managers don't want it to go, like toward ranches.
And the firs really don't belong here anyway — they push out the sagebrush and actually hurt the sage grouse, the iconic bird species that lives in the valley. Hawks roost on the tall firs to spot the grouse in the brush below. The firs give the hawks an advantage that upsets the balance between prey and predator. When fires were allowed to take their natural course, the firs were burned out.
But the aspen trees, which are naturally part of this landscape, don't burn as readily. Fire managers refer to them as a "wet blanket" that slows fires down.
Managing The Land
A crew in Centennial Valley is taking out the firs with chainsaws. Grace Stanley, who works for the Montana Conservation Corps, puts down her saw and reaches under her hardhat to wipe some sweat from her forehead.
"Right now we're working to thin conifers so aspen can flourish," she says. It's a long day's work. "We typically camp. We wake up around 6 o'clock, make some breakfast, then we do a stretch circle, then we get on the saws from about 8 a.m. to 5 p.m." It's exciting work, she says, though at the end of the day, it's a little hard for her to hear.
Stanley has helped start controlled burns, which, she says, scares people. "I know that every time we've done burns we get a lot of calls to the fire department, people saying, 'Oh, no, why would you do that?' People don't really understand that fire regenerates, and it's a natural process that the earth needs," she says.
Down a gravel road a few miles, you can see what fire has done here. Korb and I stop and look up at a hillside that's a patchwork of green and brown.
"This is the Winslow fire," Korb says, pointing into the distance. "Those two patches up there is what burned severely in 2003. To the left — those smaller patches — that's ideally what we'd like to see fire doing." The Winslow fire didn't sweep across the whole hillside as so many fires do these days. It's more like the way fire used to burn naturally, in a "patchy" way. "It creates more diverse habitats," Korb says, "different habitats for different species."
Later in the day, I meet a guy who starts fires in the area: George Johnson, the burn boss for the Nature Conservancy. He and Korb walk me up to a ridge overlooking a 100-acre valley. This is the area they plan to burn this year.
"That far face over there, from the ridge line toward the snow pack over there, you come down on a diagonal to creek bottom," Johnson says. He uses the natural topography of the place, along with snow lines and damp valley bottoms and a few dirt roads, as fire breaks. "So it's a mix of sagebrush and wild rye and then the conifer that you see — that's the primary burn area." The sagebrush will benefit from this fire, and it will blunt the invasion of the conifers.
Johnson is a former smokejumper with more than 100 jumps in his career. He says fighting fire with fire — literally — makes sense, even if it may not seem logical to some. "It's hard to convince people it's a good thing," he says. "They've seen too many homes go up [in flames] on the news. And it's hard to get the message across that this has been going on for thousands and thousands of years."
It's not easy to bring fire back in a landscape with people and livestock and homes in it. But the alternative, says Korb, is worse. "When we light fires, we can choose the conditions that the fires are burning under," he says. That makes them easier to control.
Without the kind of thinning and burning that crews like this do, the backcountry forests of the West get overgrown to the point where natural fires become unstoppable. The U.S. Forest Service says it needs to thin or do prescribed burns in more than 200 million acres of Forest Service land; so far they only have money to do 3 million acres a year.
And the result is an increase in the number and severity of big fires in the West.
"They are burning under the most severe conditions," says Korb, "and we're not getting patches — we're getting whole landscapes that are turning black."
Scientists call this landscape change "type conversion," where the native mix of vegetation is burned out and permanently replaced with something else that's more fire-tolerant. When that happens, the mix of animals and plants that lived there changes as well, and the Western ecosystem we're currently familiar with becomes something quite different.
RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:
This is WEEKEND EDITION from NPR News. I'm Rachel Martin. Firefighters are still battling to contain a huge wildfire in Southern California. It threatens communities in the mountains near Palm Springs. But wildfire was once essential to the American West. Prairies and forests burned regularly, and those fires regenerated the land. But when homes and ranches expanded into the wilderness, those prescribed fires stopped happening. Now, scientists are trying to bring fire back to the wilderness to recreate what nature once did on its own. NPR's Christopher Joyce recently visited sagebrush rangeland in Montana to see how that's done.
CHRISTOPHER JOYCE, BYLINE: Rimmed by snow-capped mountains, Centennial Valley is about as wild as it gets in the lower 48. In part, that's because the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and now The Nature Conservancy own big patches of it, and keep it wild. But one wild thing is missing: fire. For millennia, fire maintained a sea of thick, knee-high sagebrush, short grass and clusters of aspen trees. But a century ago, the government decided to stop all wildfire. That upset the balance.
(SOUNDBITE OF CHAINSAW)
JOYCE: Now, scientists are bringing fire back by letting natural fires burn or by starting them. Nathan Korb is an ecologist with The Nature Conservancy.
NATHAN KORB: So, we're on private land adjacent to wilderness and we're trying to make the private land safe for fire, so that fire managers can allow fires to burn naturally when they get started in the wilderness.
JOYCE: So, a fire crew is removing fir trees - they burn too vigorously and can spread fire where fire managers don't want it to go - toward ranches, for example. And the firs really don't belong here anyway. They push out the sagebrush and they actually hurt the sage-grouse, the iconic bird species here. Hawks roost on the tall firs to spot the grouse in the brush below. When fires were allowed to burn naturally, the firs got burned out.
GRACE STANLEY: My name is Grace Stanley. I work for the Montana Conservation Corps, and right now we're working to thin conifers so aspens can flourish.
JOYCE: The aspen don't burn as readily. Fire managers refer to them as a wet blanket that slows fires down. Aspen trees are naturally part of this landscape.
: We typically camp. We wake up around 6 o'clock, make some breakfast, then we do a stretch circle, then we'll get on the saws from about 8 A.M. till about 5 P.M. You know, it's really exciting. It's a little hard to hear right now but that's OK.
(SOUNDBITE OF CHAINSAWS AND MAN YELLING)
JOYCE: Stanley has helped start fires before. She says it scares people.
: I know that every time we've done burns, we get a lot of calls to the fire department, people saying, oh no, why would you do that type of attitude. People don't really understand that fire regenerates and it's a natural process that the Earth needs.
(SOUNDBITE OF CAR DOORS CLOSING AND FOOTSTEPS)
JOYCE: Nathan Korb and I visit the site of a fire that burned here 10 years ago.
KORB: This is the Winslow Fire. This is a county road.
JOYCE: So, when we look up here at this rise, some of it looks burnt.
KORB: Those two patches up there is what burned severely in 2003. To the left, those smaller patches, that's ideally what we'd like to see fire doing. And those are more similar to what burned more historically.
JOYCE: And why is that ideal?
KORB: Because it creates more a diverse habitat.
JOYCE: So, you want patches basically.
KORB: Patches - different habitat needs for different species.
JOYCE: When this landscape is left to burn naturally, wildfires thin the trees and grass, keep them from getting too thick and then burning in a huge mega-fire.
GEORGE JOHNSON: My name is George Johnson and I'm a collaborative burn boss with The Nature Conservancy.
JOYCE: Johnson starts fires. He and Korb walk me up a ridge overlooking a 100-acre valley. So, this is what you guys want to burn.
JOHNSON: Yeah. That far face over there from the ridgeline towards the snow pack over there, you come down on a diagonal to the creek bottom. So, it's this mix of sagebrush base and wild rye and then the conifers that you see. So, that's the primary burn area.
JOYCE: He'll use the snowline and the wet valley bottom and a couple of dirt roads as fire breaks and wait till the humidity and wind conditions are just right. Johnson's a former smoke jumper, with over 100 jumps in his career. He says fighting fire with fire - literally - makes sense to him, but it may not seem logical.
JOHNSON: It's hard to convince people it's a good thing. They've seen too many homes go up on the news and that. And it's hard to get the message across that this has been going on for thousands and thousands of years.
JOYCE: That's what scientists like The Conservancy's Nathan Korb are trying to do - bring back fire's natural role, but in a landscape with people and livestock and homes in it. It's not easy, but the alternative, says Korb, is worse.
KORB: When we light fires, we can choose the conditions that the fires are burning under.
JOYCE: But many of the big fires now in the West are unstoppable.
KORB: They're burning under the most severe conditions, and we're not getting patches. We're getting whole landscapes that are turning black.
JOYCE: Christopher Joyce, NPR News.
MARTIN: NPR photographer John Poole traveled with Chris Joyce to Montana. You can see his photographs of the Montana wilderness that scientists are trying to save at npr.org. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.